Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/10/06/12:41:06
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 04:21:39PM +0200, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chris Faylor [mailto:cgf AT cygnus DOT com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2000 2:47 AM
>> To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
>> Subject: Re: make[5]: execvp: C:/Cygwin/bin/bash.exe: No more
>> processes
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:40:10PM -0400, Guy T. Moore Jr. wrote:
>> >Cygwin'ers:
>> >
>> >
>> >I've somewhat narrowed down a make error based on the level
>> >of nested makes but using our build system the way it is.
>> >i.e.: I cannot prove that my error is only related to the
>> > number of nested makes.
>> >
>> >So I guess this is stack related or some other resource that
>> >I would like to bump up.
>> >
>> >What resource is my error related to, and can I bump it up
>> >using what command?
>>
>> Since the only message you're getting is "no more processes", I
>> would guess that it may be accurate. How about adding a 'ps -ef'
>> to each recursion, to verify.
>>
>> cygwin 1.1.4 only allows a limited number of processes. I've removed
>> this limitation in the snapshots. Now you can have as many processes
>> as Windows allows.
>
>Sorry, this is the answer to my preceding e-mail... should have read th
>ewhole thread (my own excuse is that outlook had split the thread for some
>mysterious reason...)
>
>>
>> So, two things: 1) try adding the 'ps', and 2) try a snapshot.
>>
>
>Thanks; however I'll probably wait for the next cygwin release :-)
That's a shame. It's likely that there will be problems in the next release
if no one tests the snapshots.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -