Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<031001c02f05$f3c52760$e98906d5@default>
From:	"Andreas Eibach" <a DOT eibach AT gmx DOT net>
To:	"Earnie Boyd" <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
References:	<20001005204454 DOT 17469 DOT qmail AT web110 DOT yahoomail DOT com>
Subject:	Re: -mno-cygwin question
Date:	Thu, 5 Oct 2000 21:53:36 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

> Well if there wasn't a reason to have Cygwin then that wouldn't have been
> invented either.  You've taken my question out of context, read the rest
of the
> thread.  The poster is trying to use -mno-cygwin when s/he needs Cygwin or
i.e.
> POSIX.

Alright :)
Well I really was thinking for a moment you meant it like "Do you think
non-Cygwin
exec's are necessary at all"? This made me a little curious. :)

Sorry for the noise,
 Andreas


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -