Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:49:58 -0400
From:	Jeffrey Juliano <juliano AT cs DOT unc DOT edu>
Reply-To:	Jeffrey Juliano <juliano AT cs DOT unc DOT edu>
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: gmake is slow under cygwin
Message-ID:	<3770557360.970138198@dsl-64-34-95-237.telocity.com>
In-Reply-To:	<20000927002710.A7341@cygnus.com>
X-Mailer:	Mulberry/2.0.5b2 (Win32)
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 12:27 AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 11:55:27PM -0400, Jeffrey Juliano wrote:

>> My proposed change would make path handling even less symmetric, so
>> perhaps  it's not a good idea afterall.  Is this even worth discussing?
>
> No, I don't think so.  I'm not really going to be swayed on this issue.

Agreed.  Especially after finding the thread "File name syntax (WAS: RE: 
FW: Can not config sshd)", which I had not previously read.  Sorry to bring 
it up again.

In that thread, Chris points out that a leading double-slash is allowed to 
be handled as a special case, and there are unix systems that do so.  I 
guess that means that any code that doesn't take this into account is 
broken anyway a portability standpoint.

-jeff


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -