delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/09/07/15:02:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <200009071900.AA09879@mlx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 3.3 v148.2.1)
From: MarketLogix <mlx AT mlx DOT com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:00:50 -0700
To: Barnali <gbarnali AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: Re: select() on more than 64 fds
Cc: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Reply-To: mlx AT san DOT rr DOT com
References: <20000907165349 DOT 6141 DOT qmail AT web5409 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>

Hi.

Try -> setdtablesize().

bisk

Begin forwarded message:

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-mlx=san DOT rr DOT com AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>,  
<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Barnali <gbarnali AT yahoo DOT com>
Subject: select() on more than 64 fds
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com

hi,
what exactly is the limitation on select() ? I need
to have as many as a couple of thousand sockets open
and call select() on them. is this at all possible ?
the header seems to indicate that I can redefine a
constant to increase the size of fd_set from the
default of 64. if I do this should I recompile the
cygwin dll with the new value ?
also how much of a performance hit does cygwin
select take as compared to an equivalent winsock
function doing a similar job (large no. of sockets)
thanks in advance,

barnali

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019