delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-ID: | <20000907165349.6141.qmail@web5409.mail.yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:53:49 -0700 (PDT) |
From: | Barnali <gbarnali AT yahoo DOT com> |
Subject: | select() on more than 64 fds |
To: | cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
hi, what exactly is the limitation on select() ? I need to have as many as a couple of thousand sockets open and call select() on them. is this at all possible ? the header seems to indicate that I can redefine a constant to increase the size of fd_set from the default of 64. if I do this should I recompile the cygwin dll with the new value ? also how much of a performance hit does cygwin select take as compared to an equivalent winsock function doing a similar job (large no. of sockets) thanks in advance, barnali __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |