Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<C2D7D58DBFE9D111B0480060086E9635021D9E0C@mail.gft.de>
From:	"Schaible, Joerg" <Joerg DOT Schaible AT gft DOT de>
To:	"Ryan B. Caveney" <Ryan DOT B DOT Caveney AT saic DOT com>, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	RE: G++ and ISO C++ conformity?
Date:	Thu, 7 Sep 2000 10:49:31 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id EAA18056

Hi Ryan,

> > Header files that could not be found:
> >      <limits>   e.g. numeric_limits<int>::max();
> >         <sstream>  e.g. ostringstream ost;
>
> what I can say is that the stringstream stuff is there -- 
> it's just named
> differently.  On my Cygwin (1.1.2 base), /usr/include/g++-3/ contains
> strstream, not sstream, and the classes it defines are called 
> things like
> ostrstream, not ostringstream.  HTH.

Sorry to say, but you're wrong. The headers and classes you detected were
part of the ANSI-C++ 2.0 spec, the others are part of ANSI-C++ 3.0 and
should be there.

limits: it is known that it is missing
sstream: new IO classes are in development and hopefully ready soon

Try www.STLport.org

Jörg

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -