Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	"'Jonas Jensen'" <bones0_list AT hotmail DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: printf is faster when piped through tee
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 16:21:45 -0400
Message-ID:	<000301c0151b$6f3023a0$f536ba8c@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
In-Reply-To:	<OE45q6DqaJY4kJSFsxf00000768@hotmail.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211
Importance:	Normal

Jonas Jensen writes:
>
>> >Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with
>> >gcc, printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny
>> >thing is that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both
>> >(equally) fast.
>>
>
>Did you do this on purpose or something? It seems a bit weird that a write
>takes _excactly_ 1/100th of a second, both on my GeForce-powered desktop
>comp. and my weak laptop...
>

Hint -
you might want to perform your test using this terminal or something similar
http://www.io.com/~bub/rxvt.html
instead of the console device.

Norman


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -