Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[212.54.81.249]
From:	"Jonas Jensen" <bones0_list AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	<mlx AT san DOT rr DOT com>, "Cygwin List" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<OE9jWwY0VnkB4ltFlmm000000a8 AT hotmail DOT com><20000902123113 DOT A1626 AT cygnus DOT com><OE45q6DqaJY4kJSFsxf00000768 AT hotmail DOT com> <200009021933 DOT AA01256 AT mlx DOT com>
Subject:	Re: printf is faster when piped through tee
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 21:50:46 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:	<OE34EfptzI4cdbiknUT00000811@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Sep 2000 19:49:09.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC7FF110:01C01516]

> > Did you do this on purpose or something? It seems a bit weird that a
write
> > takes _excactly_ 1/100th of a second, both on my GeForce-powered desktop
> > comp. and my weak laptop...
>
> I think disk I/O speed is probably much more dependant on your
> (E)IDE controller & disk than the things generally considered
> performance enhancement points on newer PCs. ie. CPU, RAM, video,
> etc ... If we were talking SCSI, then I'd be more surprised.

Ok, maybe that paragraph was a bit ambiguous... Next time you'll want to
read the whole thread. I'm talking about writing to the screen, not the
disk.
For the record, I'm using SCSI, so don't ya worry ;-)

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -