Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Originating-IP:	[212.54.81.249]
From:	"Jonas Jensen" <bones0_list AT hotmail DOT com>
To:	"Cygwin List" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<OE9jWwY0VnkB4ltFlmm000000a8 AT hotmail DOT com> <20000902123113 DOT A1626 AT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: printf is faster when piped through tee
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 20:59:23 +0200
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID:	<OE45q6DqaJY4kJSFsxf00000768@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Sep 2000 18:59:05.0071 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD7837F0:01C0150F]

Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
> >Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with
> >gcc, printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny
> >thing is that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both
> >(equally) fast.
>
> Thanks for the first part of your report.  I'm awaiting your analysis of
> why this is the case.

I have no idea! AFAICS, tee and cat (which work properly) use write() for
outputting, but this function has the same problem when I call
it. -mno-cygwin makes that problem go away.

Did you do this on purpose or something? It seems a bit weird that a write
takes _excactly_ 1/100th of a second, both on my GeForce-powered desktop
comp. and my weak laptop...

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -