Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 2 Sep 2000 12:31:13 -0400
To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: printf is faster when piped through tee
Message-ID:	<20000902123113.A1626@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<OE9jWwY0VnkB4ltFlmm000000a8 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<OE9jWwY0VnkB4ltFlmm000000a8@hotmail.com>; from bones0_list@hotmail.com on Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:11:08PM +0200

On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 04:11:08PM +0200, Jonas Jensen wrote:
>Something's wrong with the performance of printf. When compiling with gcc,
>printf executes much slower than with Microsoft's "cl". The funny thing is
>that when I pipe those programs through "tee", they're both (equally) fast.

Thanks for the first part of your report.  I'm awaiting your analysis of
why this is the case.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -