Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 11:55:56 -0400
To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: DLL naming conventions
Message-ID:	<20000831115556.F5412@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
References:	<20000831133952 DOT 21477 DOT qmail AT web123 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <39AE7E06 DOT CEFB0BC8 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To:	<39AE7E06.CEFB0BC8@ece.gatech.edu>; from cwilson@ece.gatech.edu on Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:47:18AM -0400

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:47:18AM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>(This argument is based on the supposition that dll's with the same name
>will always conflict. If I'm wrong about that supposition, please
>correct me...as I stated above, I'm a bit confused as to when dll's will
>conflict and when they will not)

Can someone write a simple test to verify Windows behavior?  It's pointless
to argue about what Windows does with DLLs if we don't know for sure.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -