Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 31 Aug 2000 15:11:51 +0300
From:	Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.32) S/N AB51B607
Reply-To:	Paul Sokolovsky <paul-ml AT is DOT lg DOT ua>
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<3633.000831@is.lg.ua>
To:	Chris Faylor <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re[2]: DLL naming conventions
In-reply-To:	<20000830143629.C26083@cygnus.com>
References:	<20000830143629 DOT C26083 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hello Chris,

Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com> wrote:

CF> Here's the convention that makes sense to me "Cygwin's DLLs are named
CF> similarly to their counterparts on UNIX so that a library named libz.so
CF> on UNIX is named libz.dll under Cygwin.  Under the bushwah GNU porting
CF> layer, similar libraries are named bushwalibz.dll."

    You missed it! You missed it! "Bushwah GNU porting layer" uses
'libfoo.so' as the name for its DLLs! Well, but now I think: wasn't it
too arrogant? ;-)

CF> Works for me.

    Great!

CF> cgf

--
Paul Sokolovsky, IT Specialist
http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=11135



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -