Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 29 Aug 2000 12:59:17 +0400
From:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.45) Personal
Reply-To:	Egor Duda <deo AT logos-m DOT ru>
Organization:	DEO
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<687046896.20000829125917@logos-m.ru>
To:	Pierre Muller <muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
CC:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: GDB core dump support for cygwin gives compilation failure!
In-reply-To:	<200008290849.KAA27463@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr>
References:	<200008290827 DOT KAA27086 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<7179290415 DOT 20000825121243 AT logos-m DOT ru> <1321 DOT 000825 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<20000824171449 DOT B15203 AT cygnus DOT com> <7179290415 DOT 20000825121243 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<200008290827 DOT KAA27086 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
	<200008290849 DOT KAA27463 AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hi!

Tuesday, 29 August, 2000 Pierre Muller muller AT cerbere DOT u-strasbg DOT fr wrote:

>>PM>  I  can't  compile  GDB for cygwin anymore apparently since this
>>'core dump PM> support' patch .
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>PM> I don't have a sys/procfs.h header in my includes !!
>>PM> I installed it using the latest GUI setup program,
>>PM> isn't that enough to be able to compile the GDB on CVS ??
>>PM> What is missing in my installation ?
>>
>>the  answer  is  simple  --  sys/procfs.h  file is missing in includes
>>directories. You have to get two files from sourceware cvs --
>>winsup/cygwin/include/sys/procfs.h and
>> winsup/cygwin/include/cygwin/core_dump.h

PM>   Do you mean that adding the headers to my include dir would be enough ?
PM>   Probably I also need a library that includes the functions defined 
PM> inside those headers (unless they only contain type definitions)

no, they don't contain any function prototypes. you can check them out
or look at them via cvsweb and see.

>>to  build cvs version of gdb it's sometimes needed to use  cvs version
>>of cygwin.

PM>   That's what I suspected, but I don't know if this is a good practice!

certainly, unless you know what you're doing.

PM> Imagine that GDB 5.1 is released before next Cygwin release !

and i suppose those who will be releasing it know what they doing :)

Egor.            mailto:deo AT logos-m DOT ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -