Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	<evansbryant AT look DOT ca>
To:	<cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Deprecating Automount (was Re: Why not mount / at C: ?)
Date:	Thu, 24 Aug 2000 16:40:53 -0700
Message-ID:	<001601c00e24$bdba7960$5c8e42d8@raptor>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-reply-to:	<20000824164455.518.qmail@web111.yahoomail.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Importance:	Normal

> Ok, we don't eliminate the /cygdrive feature; but, I can see the argument,
> especially with inetutils and login supplying remote access, that one only
> wants to allow access to directories in the Mount Table with the
> Cygwin Tools.
> Shouldn't we allow for [no]automount?

Is there a way to make Cygdrive an explicit entry in the mount table? That
way it could either be there or not.

~Neil


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -