delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/08/22/14:06:51

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: "Mark Weaver" <mark AT npsl DOT co DOT uk>
To: "David M. Karr" <dkarr AT tcsi DOT com>, <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: Only 128m practical for W98: Cygwin, Apache, Tomcat, & Emacs?
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 19:10:55 +0100
Message-ID: <IPEDKNOBIIIMBDFLLALKMEKECBAA.mark@npsl.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-reply-to: <20000822124104.11504.qmail@web125.yahoomail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal

I think that the problem you are having is most likely to be W98, not the
amount of memory that you have.  This "OS" doesn't manage resources anywhere
near as well as NT - it still has separate heaps for certain object types -
and these can get used up long before you run out of memory.  (You can see
this by running resource monitor and several copies of a hungry app like
Visual C++).  Probably the best thing that you can do is upgrade to NT/W2K.

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
> Sent: 22 August 2000 13:41
> To: David M. Karr; cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: Re: Only 128m practical for W98: Cygwin, Apache, Tomcat, &
> Emacs?
>
>
> --- "David M. Karr" <dkarr AT tcsi DOT com> wrote:
> > I use NT at work, which is configured with Cygwin, Apache, Tomcat,
> > Emacs, and other things.  I have 256m RAM on it.  Things work
> > reasonably well.
> >
>
> Great! ;)
>
> > I have a W98 system at home, which until now I haven't pushed very
> > hard.  It "only" has 128m RAM.  I'm finding that after running Apache
> > and Tomcat, and running Emacs and some occasional scripts (using
> > Cygwin tools), the system becomes quite unstable in abnormal ways,
> > like "xargs" or "find" dying, or getting big "Almost out of resources"
> > dialogs, before the system gets completely hung.
> >
> > The question is, is this situation likely to improve if I increase my
> > RAM from 128m to 256m?
> >
>
> Hmm...  the increase in RAM would improve your performance
> slightly; but, how
> much room is left on your system drive?  Win9x uses a percentage
> of the unused
> portions of your system drive for the virtual memory paging
> files.  If you've
> used more than half of the system drive then buying another drive
> would be of
> more benefit.  Also, try defragmenting the drive to see if that helps.
>
> Cheers,
>
> =====
> ---
>    Earnie Boyd: <mailto:earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
>             __Cygwin: POSIX on Windows__
> Cygwin Newbies: <http://gw32.freeyellow.com/>
>            __Minimalist GNU for Windows__
>   Mingw32 List: <http://www.egroups.com/group/mingw32/>
>     Mingw Home: <http://www.mingw.org/>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail  Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019