Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/08/14/03:55:14
AFAIK the texinfo part of gcc is not intended to be maintained, rather
will be removed from that distribution, so it seems logical enough to
remove it ourselves when we already have a satisfactory makeinfo
incorporated in cygwin. Yes, Mumit did a great deal of the work to
include cygwin with secondary support or whatever they call it in gcc,
but that doesn't extend to the texinfo part of gcc, which we don't need.
Tim Prince
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Faylor" <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: makeinfo not built to run under win32 ?
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 10:46:14AM -0400, Chuck Meade wrote:
> >When you say that the version on sources has a lot of extra
> >patches, do you mean the version of makeinfo in cygwin, or the
> >makeinfo source in gcc?
>
> I mean the gcc sources. Mumit Khan did a lot of work on gcc itself.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
>
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -