delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/08/04/11:05:58

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 11:01:12 -0400
From: Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Cc: tprince AT computer DOT org
Subject: Re: Minor cygwin/binutils problems
Message-ID: <20000804110112.G9574@cygnus.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com, tprince AT computer DOT org
References: <3988268D DOT 25B640E5 AT ife DOT ee DOT ethz DOT ch> <20000802152336 DOT A541 AT cygnus DOT com> <398AA2A1 DOT 3C5E62A7 AT ife DOT ee DOT ethz DOT ch> <005401bffe24$4528c200$0100000a AT TIMYX18EWDT6RQ>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
In-Reply-To: <005401bffe24$4528c200$0100000a@TIMYX18EWDT6RQ>; from tprince@computer.org on Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 07:57:02AM -0700

On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 07:57:02AM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
>I've been trying the standard binutils source (not the cygwin version),
>and it is not fully working for me.  I'm sure that's not news, but I'd
>like to know if there's a simple way to recover the binutils binaries
>which came with cygwin1.1.2 in order to do some comparison tests. Or
>even the source code of that and the current version.

Again, I suggest that if you are having problems, sending email to the
binutils mailing list is the best way to rectify them.

If you do this, please be advised that "not fully working for me" is not
really an adequate bug report.  I'm sure that the binutils readers will
appreciate more details.

cgf

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Thomas Sailer" <sailer AT ife DOT ee DOT ethz DOT ch>
>To: <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>; <juliano AT cs DOT unc DOT edu>; "Chris Faylor"
><cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
>Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 4:01 AM
>Subject: Re: Minor cygwin/binutils problems
>
>
>>Chris Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 03:47:57PM +0200, Thomas Sailer wrote:
>>>>I'm having minor problems with recent cygwin binutils (I compiled them
>>>>by myself as cross tools hosted on both sun-sparc-solaris2.5.1 and
>>>>linux-i386 from the cygwin sources downloaded about 2 months ago).
>>>
>>>If you are having problems with binutils, then you probably should
>>>report them to the binutils mailing list, especially, if this is not
>>>the version that is available from the cygwin download site.
>>
>>They'll probably tell me to use their sources instead of those
>>distributed with cygwin 8-)
>>
>>But I've checked, the same problems also show up with the cygwin
>>binaries.
>>
>>Jeffrey Juliano wrote:
>>
>>>I, too, have been trying to build a cross compiler (linux and irix
>>>hosted variants).  I'm using sources from the cygwin latest directory.
>>>cygwin-1.1.2 vintage.
>>
>>Don't get me wrong, I can build .exe's and .dll's with the cross
>>compiler/binutils, they work and objdump recognizes binaries created by
>>ld.  That's why I wrote "minor problems" :)

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019