Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Andre Oliveira da Costa" <costa AT cade DOT com DOT br>
To:	"cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Accessing local hard disks
Date:	Wed, 2 Aug 2000 12:01:54 -0300
Message-ID:	<001c01bffc92$9885bef0$5400000a@costa>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-reply-to:	<3987D106.9C6F76A1@cygnus.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Importance:	Normal

Hi Corinna,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2000 4:43 AM
> To: Mathis Severin
> Cc: 'cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com'
> Subject: Re: Accessing local hard disks

[snip]

> Try it. Symlinks should be slower in either case but I can't remember
> of any published performance measurement.

I remember once reading something on the list stating that a big mount table
could lead to loss of performance. Is this still true with the new versions
of the lib? (1.1.x)

TIA.

Andre Costa
--
André Oliveira da Costa
(costa AT cade DOT com DOT br)


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -