Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/08/01/21:32:50
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 06:21:36PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote:
>
>
>On 1 Aug 2000, at 20:46, the Illustrious Chris Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:39:51PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote: >Hi
>> folks, > > From what I can tell, the values noted in the
>> subject line >are not defined as part of standard non-mingw32
>> headers. > > My question is, how does Cygwin deal with argc,
>> argv without >using mingw32 headers?
>>
>> Like any UNIX program (or Windows program for that matter). They
>> are arguments to main:
>
> Yes, I know that...I also realize that these sound like foolish
>questions that only a newbie would ask...when working with three
>or four different compiler ports at any given time, they tend to
>get mixed up...
>
>>
>> int main (int argc, char **argv);
>
> More specifically, is argc, argv defined with or w/o leading
>underscores for Cygwin when it comes to defining them for a
>main() routine?
>
> csMain (argc, argv); (Cygwin?)
> csMain (__argc, __argv); (Mingw/MS)
> csMain(_argc,_argv); (Borland)
I don't know what "csMain" is but it doesn't matter what you name
an argument. You can call them "fred" and "ethel" of you want.
Or, "__fred" and "__ethel", if you prefer.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -