delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
X-Envelope-Sender-Is: | Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) |
From: | "Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru> |
To: | "cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
Cc: | <Cygwin AT Sourceware DOT Cygnus DOT Com> |
Subject: | RE: putenv() - copying environment string violates Unix specs? |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:37:57 +0400 |
Message-ID: | <001f01bff62c$c7b512f0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Importance: | Normal |
In-reply-to: | <397D6B77.51D3B6A6@cygnus.com> |
> > You're right and I think it should possible to change that but > I'm not sure if that will make it into 1.1.3. > Of course, then setenv() should never attempt to reuse old environment string. Just occured to me. That gives consitent handling - caller is responsible for allocating and freeing environment strings. -andrej -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |