Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru (at relayer goliath.siemens.de)
From:	"Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>
To:	<Cygwin AT Sourceware DOT Cygnus DOT Com>
Subject:	memory leak in setenv()?
Date:	Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:30:05 +0400
Message-ID:	<001201bff612$88df19f0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal

If existing value is longer than new, old value is simply overwritten.
But if old value is shorter, new memory chunk is allocated via malloc(),
but old one is never freed. Initially all environment strings are
allocated using strdup() in environ_init(), so who is responsible for
freeing unused memory in this case?

Do I miss something here?

-andrej

Have a nice DOS!
B >>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -