Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:51:36 -0400
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Extending cygwin's process table (progress report)
Message-ID:	<20000724225136.A9327@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<20000718234319 DOT A16333 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000724001546 DOT A24454 AT cygnus DOT com> <20000724002537 DOT A24506 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<20000724002537.A24506@cygnus.com>; from cgf@cygnus.com on Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:25:37AM -0400

On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:25:37AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 12:15:46AM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>>Ok.  I have pulled apart cygwin's process table creation and
>>reimplemented everything using windows pids.  The result is pretty
>>incredible.
>
>I should point out that many other times when I've done something to
>cygwin that resulted in a big performance increase, the reason was
>that I'd stupidly forgotten some crucial detail.
>
>Hopefully that isn't the case here.

I just wanted to mention that I tried my changes on Windows 95.

I hate Windows 95.

I don't think I've mentioned that this week.

My reason this week is that all of the Windows 95 pids are very
small negative numbers.

Sigh.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -