Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/07/19/17:30:27
Hi Chris,
I don't bother.
I dunno if PID 1is special to NT, but my System process is currently 2,
FWIW.
In case of a problematic PID assigned, perhaps retry creating another
process first, then terminate the original?
Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Faylor [SMTP:cgf AT cygnus DOT com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 05:43
> To: cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> Subject: Extending cygwin's process table
>
> I am planning on revamping cygwin's process table for version 1.1.4.
> I hope to make process creation a little faster and to also allow many
> more cygwin processes.
>
> I'm also toying with trying to more closely tie cygwin pids to windows
> pids.
>
> Is anyone going to be bothered if pid creation is not monotonic? By
> that I mean, parent pid 1000 may not create child pid 1001. It may
> create child pid 27.
>
> It may still not be feasible to use cygwin pids as windows pids
> (possibly because I don't believe that pid 1 is special to windows)
> but
> I thought I'd give this a try anyway unless there is something that
> I'm
> missing.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -