Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<396EE0BA.20437355@cybertec.com.au>
Date:	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 19:43:22 +1000
From:	Chris Johns <cjohns AT cybertec DOT com DOT au>
Organization:	Cybertec Pty Ltd
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT hotpop DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Have rename() semantics changed?
References:	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747 AT silldn_mail1 DOT sanwaint DOT com>
	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171747 AT silldn_mail1 DOT sanwaint DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20000713122755 DOT 01dbc620 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
> 
> According to the MSDN, FILE_SHARE_DELETE is a NT/W2K thingy.  That implies
> that this functionality is only available there.  One would hope that
> enabling it doesn't cause 9x to misbehave but who knows.  I suppose the
> constant could be conditionally compiled in if need be...
> 

This may explain the patch problem I reported not long ago. I think I
failed to meantion this was on Win95.

-- 
 Chris Johns, mailto:cjohns AT cybertec DOT com DOT au mailto:ccj AT acm DOT org


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -