Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<779F20BCCE5AD31186A50008C75D9979171748@silldn_mail1.sanwaint.com>
From:	"Fifer, Eric" <EFifer AT sanwaint DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Have rename() semantics changed?
Date:	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 17:50:29 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Chris Faylor wrote:
>Can you still unlink opened files on Windows 9x, Windows NT, and W2K
>with this change?  I believe that is why I removed this.  Either that
>or it prevented files from being opened.  Sorry that I don't remember.

At least on WinNT, I can unlink an open file when FILE_SHARE_DELETE is
included in the shared flag.  Sorry, I don't have a W2K system handy.
Also, looking at cvsweb, FILE_SHARED_DELETE was only ever used if
os_being_run
was WinNT, so there should be no impact on Win9x.

Thanks,

Eric

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -