Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<396DD038.248A100A@cygnus.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jul 2000 16:20:40 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT cygnus DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686)
X-Accept-Language:	de, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Stewart Greenhill <greenhil AT murdoch DOT edu DOT au>
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: Have rename() semantics changed?
References:	<396D3E12 DOT FB3AFA79 AT murdoch DOT edu DOT au>

Stewart Greenhill wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The latest cygwin seems not to allow open files to be renamed. This
> works under Unix. It is not normally allowed under Windows, but worked
> in previous versions of the cygwin environment.
> 
> Is this an official change, or could it be a bug?

I have backtracked the sources 'til June 1999 and I couldn't
find _any_ code in rename() which would allow that explicitly.

AFAIK, the only special case is unlink() which tries to delete
files later if they are currently locked to simulate U*X behaviour.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -