Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/07/12/00:39:57
On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:42:53PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2000 at 11:12:36PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> >I haven't seen it under Windows NT 4.0SP5, and I would imagine it probably
> >would not show up under Windows 2K, since that is a descendent of NT. Now, the
> >upcoming Windows ME release, which is based on the 98 branch, I would suspect
> >would show the bug.
>
> It has yet to be proved that this is a Cygwin bug and not a Windows 9x bug.
>
> I would love for it to be shown to be a Cygwin bug because then I could fix
> it. I can't fix bugs in Windows 9x or Windows ME.
I didn't mean to imply that it was a Cygwin bug (hence my speculation that
Windows ME would also fail). I suspect Microsoft never envisioned that people
would want to do the 50 million create processes (or whatever a full make all,
make install, make check winds up eating) between reboots :-)
--
Michael Meissner, Red Hat, Inc.
PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA
Work: meissner AT redhat DOT com phone: +1 978-486-9304
Non-work: meissner AT spectacle-pond DOT org fax: +1 978-692-4482
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -