Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<39634DDF.2881035A@cygnus.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:01:51 +0200
From:	Corinna Vinschen <vinschen AT cygnus DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-SMP i686)
X-Accept-Language:	de, en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Andrea Mennucc1 <debian AT Tonelli DOT sns DOT it>
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: what about 'Debian GNU/GygWin' ?
References:	<20000705163328 DOT A21338 AT Tonelli DOT sns DOT it>

Andrea Mennucc1 wrote:
> 
> hello  to all the CygWin developers.
> 
> I am a regular GNU/Linux user.
> 
> I have just met (and briefly used)
> the CygWin environment, and I am positively impressed.

Thanks.

> At this stage, I see an interesting perspective for CygWin:
> CygWin may indeed adhere to one of the main existing "packaging systems",
> like RedHat RPMs or Debian DEBs

One of our contributors is already working on a RPM release
system for Cygwin which will become our main distribution
method hopefully this year.

> I would suggest the latter, for these reasons

Uhmm, did you notice that Cygwin is a RedHat product?
IMHO, it's very unlikely that Cygwin will use other packaging
systems than RPM for that reason.

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -