Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<3962989F.B1FAB50E@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 04 Jul 2000 22:08:31 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
CC:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: binutils-20000625 and --enable-auto-image-base
References:	<39629555 DOT D74ABFDD AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <200007050153 DOT VAA03219 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>

Well, he seems to have submitted it to the main binutils list
(http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/binutils/1999-q3/msg00538.html). But, I
can't seem to find any evidence that it was actually committed in the
main binutils. 

Is it possible to include Mumit's patch, and the one posted by Eric
Fifer a few days ago, and release another version of cygwin-binutils (or
push those two patches into the main binutils, since you're releasing
out of sourceware)? I will try to sync up Mumit's patch with the
20000625 source code tonight...

--Chuck

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> It may have been something that Mumit put into his version that never
> made it to sourceware.  Due to problems with the PE backend, we've
> been using Mumit's non-cvs version for almost a year now.  The PE
> backend should be OK now, so we're back to releasing out of
> sourceware.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -