delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/06/29/10:41:26

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <46476C008A10D311BD0A0000C0775CF901AD40A2@srv-exchange.adtran.com>
From: TOMMY REYNOLDS <tommy DOT reynolds AT adtran DOT com>
To: cygwin <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject: RE: Looking for a gooood port of VI for cygwin...
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 09:39:56 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)

Corinna,

FYI: The UNIX tarball for VIM compiles OOB if done from the "/unix"
subdirectory, not the "/win32" one.

> ----------
> From: 	Corinna Vinschen[SMTP:vinschen AT cygnus DOT com]
> Reply To: 	cygwin
> Sent: 	Thursday, 29 June, 2000 09:17
> To: 	Michael H. Warfield
> Cc: 	cygwin
> Subject: 	Re: Looking for a gooood port of VI for cygwin...
> 
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> > >
> ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/win32/develop/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Hirmke_Mich
> ael/1.0/
> > 
> >         How about VIM?  <www.vim.org>
> > 
> >         It's now my preferred flavor of vi on both Unix (*BSD and Linux)
> > and on Windows.  Their site includes Windows binaries.  It supports
> color
> > syntax highlighting, multiple windows, multiple undo/redo, and works
> with
> > cscope as a few of it's optional enhancements.
> 
> Which all is supported on both, Windows _and_ U*X (as far as color is
> supported by the terminal/terminal emu).
> 
> The Windows port on their site is plain Win32. No Cygwin support. This
> is only supported by Cygwin ports like the above on ftp.franken.de.
> 
> >         Other than the multiple redo/undo, I'm unaware of any
> significant
> > differences between pure vi and vim.
> > 
> >         Pure vi uses 'u' to undo and 'u' again to redo for a single
> level
> > undo.  VIM uses 'u' to undo and '^r' to redo and you can undo and redo
> > multiple levels.
> 
> For purists:
> 
> 	:set compatible
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Developer
> Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
> 

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019