| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote: > > ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/win32/develop/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Hirmke_Michael/1.0/ > > How about VIM? <www.vim.org> > > It's now my preferred flavor of vi on both Unix (*BSD and Linux) > and on Windows. Their site includes Windows binaries. It supports color > syntax highlighting, multiple windows, multiple undo/redo, and works with > cscope as a few of it's optional enhancements. Which all is supported on both, Windows _and_ U*X (as far as color is supported by the terminal/terminal emu). The Windows port on their site is plain Win32. No Cygwin support. This is only supported by Cygwin ports like the above on ftp.franken.de. > Other than the multiple redo/undo, I'm unaware of any significant > differences between pure vi and vim. > > Pure vi uses 'u' to undo and 'u' again to redo for a single level > undo. VIM uses 'u' to undo and '^r' to redo and you can undo and redo > multiple levels. For purists: :set compatible Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |