Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<3955D41E.44B25E32@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp>
Date:	Sun, 25 Jun 2000 18:42:54 +0900
From:	Hidekuni Annaka <tantaka AT mbox DOT kyoto-inet DOT or DOT jp>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [ja] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: [Q]STL vector with -mno-cygwin
References:	<395501E8 DOT D4C90678 AT mbox DOT kyoto-inet DOT or DOT jp> <20000624162829 DOT C7325 AT cygnus DOT com>

Thanks Chris for your response.

Chris Faylor wrote:
> 
> >I'm misunderstanding? What should I do any other?
> 
> Apparently, yes, you are misunderstanding.  The word "impure_ptr" is not the
> same as "_imp___ctype" despite sharing several letters.

Please read my last mail carefully.
The error messages contain

undefined reference to `_imp___ctype_'
undefined reference to `_impure_ptr'
undefined reference to `__errno'
undefined reference to `__infinity'

By any chance, does the word "impure_ptr" mean something different 
with the word "_impure_ptr" ? 


> Despite the words in the release notice, you are apparently using an older
> version of cygwin with a newer version of gcc.  Update your cygwin DLL
> release.  I.e., do a "setup cygwin" in an empty directory.

I expect that I am using latest cygwin DLL.
I have once done "setup cygwin" in an empty directory within DOS prompt.
And I specify "sourceware.cygnus.com" as a download location.

cygwin1.dll's properties
Version : 1.1.2
BuildDate : 6 Jun 2000 22:20
APIVersion : 0.21

> The error you're getting is from attempting to link a B20.1 libcygwin.a
> library with more recent objects.

libcygwin.a's property
RenewalDate : 8 Jun 2000 8:35:16

libstdc++.s.2.10.0's property
RenewalDate : 17 Jun 2000 3:58:04

Do these properties show any wrong version?
Still am I misunderstanding?

Thanks.
---------
Hidekuni Annaka
tantaka AT mbox DOT kyoto-inet DOT or DOT jp

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -