| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
At 09:50 AM 6/16/2000, Phil Edwards wrote:
>Carl Thompson <cet AT carlthompson DOT net>:
> > Michael Nelson wrote:
> > >
> > > I just double checked all of this, and it seems GCC is a bit more
> > > tricky. If you have 0 symbols marked with dllexport all public symbols
> > > get exported. If you have >0 symbols marked with dllexport, only they
> > > get exported.
> > >
> > > I think this is where the mixup is.
> > >
> > > What I miss on UNIX is the latter feature, the ability it to only
> > > export exactly these symbols.
> >
> > OK, I will grudgingly concede that Windows might be better in that one
> > little respect, then... ;-)
>
>I won't. :-) This feature is available on "Unix" but it isn't standardized.
>It depends heavily (AFAICT) on the platform and the linker.
And MS O/S - compiler - linker features in this area aren't standardized
either so that's really not a mark against the UNIXes that do handle this
in their own way!;-)
Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX
(508) 560-1285 - cell phone
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |