Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<3949EC1E.82BB41FB@dddandr.octacon.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:58:06 +0100
From:	Don Sharp <Don DOT Sharp AT dddandr DOT octacon DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	dwsharp AT iee DOT org
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	gnuwin32 <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: /usr/bin and /usr/lib mount points (WAS: RE: telnet problems with
	current cygwin version)
References:	<20000615130755 DOT 20768 DOT qmail AT web113 DOT yahoomail DOT com> <005501bfd70b$619cc7a0$a8a11dcb AT ihug DOT co DOT nz> <200006152101 DOT RAA14784 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>

DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > But why are they mount points instead of ordinary directories? Normal
> 
> Because we never know whether a program should go in /bin or /usr/bin,
> so the mounts make all programs appear in both places.
> 

Please put this in the installation notes and/or the FAQ. I had been
wondering why the recommendation from Earnie was so strongly voiced. Now
I understand.
I have ash, bash, sh and cygwin as the only entries in /bin and the
shells are
also present in /usr/bin. On balance I agree the mount makes more sense
for Cygwin.

Thanks

Don Sharp

> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -