delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/06/13/15:15:08

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID: <3946881E.2C8F0DBC@veritas.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:14:38 -0700
From: Bob McGowan <rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com>
Organization: VERITAS Software
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Holmsand <dan AT innehallsbolaget DOT com>
CC: Cygwin mailing list <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, bug-bash AT gnu DOT org
Subject: Re: shift: can't shift that many
References: <000501bfd565$597de7e0$a7d396c1 AT inneh3>

Dan Holmsand wrote:
> 
> Actually, I think cygwin's sh is quite right - xemacs' installexe.sh tries
> to shift three args where there's only two. Changing "shift 2" to just
> "shift" in line 12 gets rid of the error message.
> 
> /dan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xemacs-nt AT xemacs DOT org [mailto:owner-xemacs-nt AT xemacs DOT org]On
> > Behalf Of John A. Turner
> > Sent: den 13 juni 2000 14:03
> > To: XEmacs on NT; Cygwin mailing list; bug-bash AT gnu DOT org
> > Subject: Re: shift: can't shift that many
> >
> >
> > "John A. Turner" wrote:
> > >
> > > I've successfully built a cygwin version of XEmacs 21.2.34
> > >
> > > however, during make install, I get lots of msgs from bash related
> > > to the shift built-in - as in the subject:
> > >
> > > shift: can't shift that many
> >
> > never mind - I can't believe this, but I've been bitten by the
> > "sh is really ash" feature in cygwin
> >
> > I've been using cygwin long enough to know better, but somehow
> > after an update I forgot to fix that
> >

The following script:

  echo $#
  shift 3
  echo $#
  echo shifting two more:
  shift 2
  echo $#

Produces the following output for sh (ash) and bash:

  $ sh shiftest a b c d
  4
  1
  shifting two more:
  shift: can't shift that many
  1

  $ bash shiftest a b c d
  4
  1
  shifting two more:
  1

The only difference is the error message generated by ash.  The final
result is the same, the last shift did not change the argument count.

I don't think this is a bug in either of shells, unless you want to
count not printing an error as the bug.  It is a bug in the original
script, however.

-- 
Bob McGowan
Staff Software Quality Engineer
VERITAS Software
rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019