Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	Fri, 9 Jun 2000 10:25:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Adam Schlegel <aceschle AT thinkage DOT ca>
To:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
cc:	tsfu AT graduate DOT hku DOT hk, cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com, jason_fu AT hkmc DOT com DOT hk
Subject:	Re: cygwin 1.1.2: undefined reference to `setlinebuf'
In-Reply-To:	<20000609135223.29802.qmail@web106.yahoomail.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10006091017220.699-100000@mailhost.thinkage.ca>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Earnie Boyd wrote:

> *IMPERITIVE* /usr/bin must be *first* in the list for PATH.
> 
This may be a stupid question, but why does /usr/bin have to be *first*?
Is it not sufficient to have it somewhere near the front of your path, so
that there is the possibility that certain programs can override the
default ones. For example, I like to maintain a ~/bin directory at the
start of my path so that I can easily stress-test programs that I am
building, without adding them to /usr/bin or /usr/local/bin. Does this
break something that I haven't noticed yet? Or is it just a bad habit that
I should break as soon as possible?

	Adam Schlegel


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -