delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
if I do not use the -r option in less command I get the following output : $ ls -l | less ESC[0mtotal 12031 drwxr-xr-x 2 shiv Administ 36864 May 24 15:19 ESC[01;34m.ESC[0m/ drwxr-xr-x 13 shiv Administ 4096 Apr 26 20:27 ESC[01;34m..ESC[0m/ -rwxr-xr-x 1 shiv Administ 107892 Apr 21 02:31 ESC[01;32maddftinfo.exe ESC[0m* -rwxr-xr-x 1 shiv Administ 202752 Feb 4 08:39 ESC[01;32maddr2line.exe $ ls -l | less -r total 12031 drwxr-xr-x 2 shiv Administ 36864 May 24 15:19 ./ drwxr-xr-x 13 shiv Administ 4096 Apr 26 20:27 ../ -rwxr-xr-x 1 shiv Administ 107892 Apr 21 02:31 addftinfo.exe* -rwxr-xr-x 1 shiv Administ 202752 Feb 4 08:39 addr2line.exe* I have aliased ls='ls --color'. After changing it to alias ls='ls --color=tty' $ ls -l | less works fine. Andrew Patrzalek wrote: > On a related note, in /etc/man.conf if I use PAGER=less -irs it will > interpret the escape sequences correctly for the man pages. If I alias > more='less -irs' I can get the neat colors for commands like ls -l | more > using dircolors ). The less manpage warns about using the 'r' command line > switch. Has anyone had problems with it? > -- shiv vihs AT rocketmail DOT com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |