Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/05/25/13:23:15
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 12:05:53PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote:
>>This may be more a question for cygwin-developers, but I hate crossposts and
>>know most readers of that list at least review this one. So, wouldn't it be
>>appropriate when compiling without -mno-cygwin for the specs file to define
>>"unix", "UNIX" and similar "standard" defines? They seem to be checked for
>>in newlib, zlib, X11, and many other sources?
>
>I don't see why it would be appropriate to define UNIX when you're specifying
>a command line option that says "This is not UNIX". So, no, I don't believe
>that this is appropriate. I don't even know that newlib will build correctly
>with -mno-cygwin.
Sorry. I misread what was written above. It does make sense to define these
and, in fact, I am fairly certain that they used to be defined.
Apologies for the misinterpretation.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -