Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
From:	Chris Faylor <cgf AT cygnus DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 25 May 2000 12:05:53 -0400
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: CygUtils Version of zip (and Symlinks)
Message-ID:	<20000525120553.E1330@cygnus.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
References:	<200005251558 DOT IAA25370 AT cygnus DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To:	<200005251558.IAA25370@cygnus.com>; from rdparker@butlermfg.com on Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500

On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:56:53AM -0500, Parker, Ron wrote:
>This may be more a question for cygwin-developers, but I hate crossposts and
>know most readers of that list at least review this one.  So, wouldn't it be
>appropriate when compiling without -mno-cygwin for the specs file to define
>"unix", "UNIX" and similar "standard" defines?  They seem to be checked for
>in newlib, zlib, X11, and many other sources?

I don't see why it would be appropriate to define UNIX when you're specifying
a command line option that says "This is not UNIX".  So, no, I don't believe
that this is appropriate.  I don't even know that newlib will build correctly
with -mno-cygwin.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -