Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/05/18/00:33:02
That seems to fix it. I did build my own version -
I'll look at the diffs for the snapshot later and see
if the change made it in. If it did, I'll use that
version instead of my homespun one. I assume it's the
changes in sigproc.*, right?
Thanks again!
- Ken.
ken_coleman AT iname DOT com
> Yup. I just checked in a fix for this. Hopefully
> it will show up in
> tonight's snapshot, assuming I didn't get it in too
> late.
>
> I appreciate your debugging of the problem, though.
> I couldn't
> duplicate this on my Windows 95 system, so, using
> the addresses that you
> supplied in your last email, I had to do a
> comparison of the assembly
> language output from the snapshot versus a version
> of the DLL with
> debugging symbols. Then, I found that I could
> easily duplicate the
> problem on my NT system...
>
> I should have just waited a little bit and your
> analysis would have
> made everything clear.
>
> If you have access to CVS you can check out my
> changes and build
> a new version of cygwin. It should work better.
>
> Thanks,
> cgf
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -