Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/05/18/00:09:16
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:53:08PM -0700, Ken Coleman wrote:
>Ok, I've got some potentially useful information. Hopefully it will
>help
>
>What I discovered is that the new 1.1.2 candidate is not crashing per
>se, it's page faulting due to stack overflow. I got a valid stackdump
>file, and by using it and GDB, I was able to see what's going on
>somewhat. It seems to be infinitely recurring among the following
>three functions:
>
>sigframe::set(sigthread &, int)
>muto::acquire(unsigned long)
>WSFO
Yup. I just checked in a fix for this. Hopefully it will show up in
tonight's snapshot, assuming I didn't get it in too late.
I appreciate your debugging of the problem, though. I couldn't
duplicate this on my Windows 95 system, so, using the addresses that you
supplied in your last email, I had to do a comparison of the assembly
language output from the snapshot versus a version of the DLL with
debugging symbols. Then, I found that I could easily duplicate the
problem on my NT system...
I should have just waited a little bit and your analysis would have
made everything clear.
If you have access to CVS you can check out my changes and build
a new version of cygwin. It should work better.
Thanks,
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -