Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Date:	17 May 2000 13:09:53 +0000
Discarded-X400-MTS-Extensions:	(43) (12) (2) (135) (115) (5) (6) (3)
From:	"Michael Ring" <Michael DOT Ring AT t-mobil DOT de>
To:	"cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: New Cygwin DLL 1.1.1
Importance:	normal
Autoforwarded:	FALSE
Message-Id:	<D821ILT399G3*@MHS>
Original-Encoded-Information-Types:	(1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (6), (1) (0) (10021) (7) (1) (0) (1)

On Wed, 17 May 00 14:19:29 +0100, you wrote:

>Hallo Christopher,
>
>I have a lot of problems with cygwin on NT4.0 (SR5) german:
>
>One on our Software Projects (on True64/Digital Alpha)	
>uses egcs 1.1.2. Now we are porting our software to Linux and NT.
>The NT port is my part...
>The last cygwin version contains gcc.2.95 .	
>Different compilers think different about c++  and
>so i tried to compile egcs-1.1.2 on NT.
>This failed: the compilation failed in stage2 (or so)
>the xgcc in Stage2 (or was it stage 1 ?) failed and
>printed an ugly message	
>
>Q: Do you know about this problem ? Can	
>   you build an egcs-1.1.2-Compiler (give me the binaries ;-) )
>

Did you use 'plain' egcs or a version with the patches from mummit khan. I
compiled egcs-1.1.2 with Mummit's patches on a cygwin-snapshot a few months ago
and everything worked fine.


Michael Ring

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -