Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/05/04/15:57:36
Chris Faylor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 06:31:18PM -0500, Tadeusz Liszka wrote:
> >Chris Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 10:24:52AM -0700, Mindy Beseler wrote:
......
> The version of ash in the new release has been updated and a lot of the
> buffer overruns have been fixed. I'd like to say that they were all fixed
> but I suspect that that can never be a true statement.
I can try it and confirm if it is now more reliable. I'm still on previous
version.
>
> If you can reliably reproduce a crash, then I have two requests 1) Please
> attempt to fix the problem, and 2) Please explain to me how Windows NT
> manages to avoid the problem.
You are kidding, right ?
I do not have enough Windows knowledge to do either of your requests. All I can
do is to try to modify my makefile without really knowing what causes the
problem. As to the 2/ my suspicion is that the error is there, just corrupts
unimportant area on NT.
'Reliable' ??? On Windows even errors are not reliable :-) It is just that if I
type 'make rebuild-all' it will eventually crash, but never in the same place.
>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
--
Tadeusz
:: The public opinion should be alarmed by its own nonexistence
:: (512)467-0618 ext. 526 :: Stanislaw J. Lec, trans. TJL
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -