Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/05/01/03:53:25
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:
<snip>
Charles> 4. Cygnus has invested lots of money and paid the
Charles> salaries of lots of developers for a long time. They own
Charles> the original copyright, and it's their privelege to
Charles> release the software under any license they like -- GPL
Charles> [free(speech) for free(beer)] or proprietary
Charles> [non-free(closed) for non-free($$$$)]. They could release
Charles> it under the Artistic license or the Debian license if
Hmm, one small point, Debian doesn't have a license - it has the
Debian Free SOftware Guidelines from which Open Source was written;
the DSFG specifies which licenses it considers free, GPL, BSD,
Artistic, the new QPL license, are all examples of "free" licenses
(again free means free speech not free beer). Check out www.debian.org
for the DSFG text.
Charles> they liked. Whatever -- it's their product. If some
Charles> bonehead company that doesn't "get" open source comes
Charles> along and says, "We'd love to use Cygwin -- but we're
Charles> stupid and we'd like to insure our eventual demise by
Charles> keeping our code closed." What should Cygnus do? Reply,
Charles> "No, go use that MS product they just absorbed." ??
<snip>
Sincerely,
Adrian Phillips
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -