Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/04/28/10:28:30
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:17:08AM -0400, The Little Prince wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David A. Cobb wrote:
>> Please allow me to add my vote in favor. [CW] however could be
>> ambiguous, [cygwin] would be better. In general the [www-] lists do
>> this as do [PDF-] lists. It's a BIG help when sifting thru the 300
>> 'grams a day I get from the tech lists I watch.
>
>yeah, i thought of [cygwin] too, just thought it would cut off more of the
>subject in the Pine index than it would need to, i really dont know how
>many people use pine, i'm just just speaking for me. and yes, i know, i
>could just configure pine to do something comparable, like change the
>index-format setting to put the sender: header somewhere in the
>index listing, but I didn't feel like it, and it makes my listing look
>weird from what i've been used to for 5 years.
>if you do it, great..if not, fine too, i'm not gonna commit suicide or
>anything :)
There is no need to continue this thread. We will not be mangling the
subject for this mailing list. That is completely and irrevocably final.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -