Mail Archives: cygwin/2000/04/25/06:41:28
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 10:12:10AM +0200, Berche, Guillaume wrote:
>>FWIW, I doubt that attempting to execute .bat files via a cygwin path
>>will work correctly since there is no code in cygwin to translate the
>>paths for cmd.exe or command.com.
>
>Then, how does cygwin handles the file permissions on those files
>(documented as follows in C:\Cygwin\html\1_GS\int02.html) ?
I'm talking about path translation and you're quoting "File permissions".
I don't understand.
cgf
>>"File permissions
>>
>>On Windows 95/98 systems, files are always readable, and Cygwin uses
>>the native read-only mode to determine if they are writable. Files are
>>considered to be executable if the filename ends with .bat, .com or
>>.exe, or if its content starts with #!. Consequently, the chmod
>>command can only affect the 'w' mode, whereas it silently ignores
>>actions involving the other modes. [...] "
>
>If the file is executable, it would seem to me logical that one can try
>to execute it. I do not know cygwin internals but I'm surprised to see
>that it used to work with Cygwin 1.0 on NT4 and seems to not work under
>Cygwin 1.0 on Windows 2000.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
- Raw text -