Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-ID:	<38E0FB70.E382D42F@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:35:28 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	John Wiersba <John DOT Wiersba AT medstat DOT com>
CC:	"'cygwin'" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Is gcc 2.91.57 good enough to build snapshots?
References:	<03F4742D8225D21191EF00805FE62B9904B3F14B AT aa-msg-01 DOT medstat DOT com>

To clarify: I recommended using gcc-2.95 to build *perl*. I've never
tried to build the cygwin dll. Although, gcc-2.95 *may* be required to
build cygwin; I don't know.

--Chuck


John Wiersba wrote:
> 
> I've downloaded and installed the snapshot from 3/16/00.  I'm now trying to
> build from the source.  I saw a post from Chuck Wilson where he recommends
> gcc 2.95.  Is that a requirement for building the latest versions of things?
> I've still got the original gcc from full.exe:
> 
> > gcc -v
> Reading specs from
> d:\opt\cygwin\cygwin-b20\H-i586-cygwin32\bin\..\lib\gcc-lib\i586-cygwin32\eg
> cs-2.91.57\specs
> gcc version egcs-2.91.57 19980901 (egcs-1.1 release)
> 
> Thanks,
> John Wiersba
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -