Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>, <http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Message-Id:	<200003220501.XAA27017@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
To:	"Andrew G. Tereschenko [home]" <tag_aka_day AT email DOT com>
cc:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Re: How soon will cyg compile via gcc ?
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Wed, 22 Mar 2000 06:50:31 +0200."
	<002a01bf93ba$607677c0$01010a0a AT SKYNET DOT local>
Date:	Tue, 21 Mar 2000 23:01:32 -0600
From:	Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>

"Andrew G. Tereschenko [home]" <tag_aka_day AT email DOT com> writes:
> How about fix wrong source in cvs ? 
> fhandler_tape.cc: In function `long long int get_ll(union LARGE_INTEGER *)'
> fhandler_tape.cc:702: `union _LARGE_INTEGER' has no member named `HighPart'
> fhandler_tape.cc:704: `union _LARGE_INTEGER' has no member named `LowPart'
> 
> I have several files with this error ... How about write _STRUCT_NAME(u.) ? [
> or u.] 

What CVS source do you have? What compiler do you have? You need to have
gcc-2.95.2 to handle anonymous unions.

Check the following output: 

  $ make VERBOSE=yes

and post what you get to the cygwin-developers list (*not* here). Before 
you do that however, make sure your CVS tree is up-to-date.

> Also how about this craizy lines :
>   BOOL (WINAPI *gdfse) (LPCSTR, long long *, long long *, long long *) =
>     (BOOL (WINAPI *) (LPCSTR, long long *, long long *, long long *))
>       GetProcAddress (k32, "GetDiskFreeSpaceExA");
> 
> Something wrong in them ... Nobody in my firm still can't find solution for t
> his puzzle ;o)

Looks fine to me. What is this puzzle exactly?

> P.S> Hmm ...Possibly i'm dummy - but how soon i will be able to to compile cy
> gwin via cygwin (gcc 2.9.2 under cygwin ;o) ?

It works now, and has worked for a while. There may be occasional
instability in the development sources, but that's part of using
development sources.

Issues dealing with building Cygwin development (CVS) sources belong in
cygwin-developers list, where these issues are discussed and solved.

Regards,
Mumit


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com

- Raw text -