| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Geoffrey Noer <noer AT cygnus DOT com> wrote: > ... > Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in improving) > Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing Cygwin to > Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against other systems I > think. Great! Have you found any way to improve the performance of commands like 'ls' against remotely mounted file systems? I frequently have things like NET USE * \\SERVER\SHARE where SERVER is located on the far end of a PPTP link to a system a few thousand miles (18-22 hops over the Internet via an ISDN connection on my end) and doing an 'ls' is unuseably slow (and I think I've tried various releases from b17 to b20.1). So, I usually try to remember to use the "command prompt" and the DIR command which works just fine. I also wave perl scripts over the remote directories (scripts that do file globbing and file system traversals) and they run fine...but they don't try to get all the file info that an 'ls -l' would - ought to try out an 'ls' command from the Perl Power Tools set sometime... At any rate...since 'ls' is hardwired into my fingers and I wander into these directories often enough, using cygwin can be painful, so I haven't gotten fully into playing with it yet. > Have people run any benchmarks comparing Cygwin, Uwin, NuTcracker, Interix, > anything else out there? That would be useful info! Scott DOT Blachowicz AT seaslug DOT org -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |