delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000, Jeff Sturm wrote: [...] > Don't be so sure. I've used GCC on Interix for a while... let's just > say that Cygwin rocks. > > The Interix product relies heavily on the POSIX subsystem, instead of > shared memory as Cygwin does. For many of my user applications the > subsystem process actually consumes more CPU time than the application! [...] Interesting. We have been trying to improve (and succeeding in improving) Cygwin's runtime performance but that's been done comparing Cygwin to Cygwin-past and not so much by doing benchmarks against other systems I think. Have people run any benchmarks comparing Cygwin, Uwin, NuTcracker, Interix, anything else out there? -- Geoffrey Noer Email: noer AT cygnus DOT com Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company http://www.redhat.com/ -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |